![]() Some fans did leap to the defence of Ghosts though, with one fan in particular saying, "Ghost ain’t bad though but it’s understandable people want to play the other better classic CoDs more because there's more nostalgia than Ghosts." Other players furthered the criticism, saying, "That game was horrible. "Ghosts sucked ass AND ended the golden era and goodwill towards the COD franchise," said popular content creator "DougDagnabbit" through the ModernWarzone page. But out of the boots-on-the-ground titles that came before the likes of Black Ops 3 and Advanced Warfare, Ghosts has been dubbed the worst of the bunch. Ghosts falls into the era of games that came before the divisive jetpacks and futuristic focus, which splits opinions massively in the Call of Duty community. ![]() Swagg slams broken and ‘mid’ Call of Duty classics like Black Ops 2Ĭall of Duty fans trash Ghosts as the worst game in the pre-jetpack era.They are the best games that the series has ever produced, aside from maybe Cold War, and they hold the fondest memories.īut despite being birthed in the same era, Call of Duty: Ghosts does not boast the same pulling power, and having been reactivated, the player count has dropped to an abysmal 129 active shooters.Įven World at War, which is the game that is renowned for sparking the series into life but yet being rather incomplete, has hit figures of nearly 2,000 players, trumping Ghosts completely. When you think of golden Call of Duty titles, your mind goes back to the Modern Warfare 2 and 3 titles on Infinity Ward's side of things and Black Ops 1 and 2 from Treyarch. Lol, reviving old CoD games and only 129 people wanna play this one. I say Call of Duty Ghosts sucked and a bunch of people jump to defend it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |